Subsidized Intelligence for Armenia
A Policy Proposal
Executive Summary
Proposal: Authorize the Ministry of High-Tech Industry, in coordination with the Ministry of Education and the Prime Minister’s Office, to open formal negotiations with OpenAI under the “OpenAI for Countries” program for a single-vendor national anchor partnership for Phases 1–2. The negotiating mandate should require contractual interoperability and exit protections that preserve optional multi-vendor expansion in Phase 3.
Evidence of impact (LLM-specific): A World Bank randomized controlled trial in Nigeria found that six weeks of AI tutoring produced learning gains comparable to roughly two years of typical schooling progress [27]. Two recent meta-analyses report large positive learning effects, with Hedges’ g ranging from 0.867 to 1.12 across 51–68 studies [12][21]. Controlled productivity studies show LLM assistance can raise writing and support-task output by 14–37% [11][22].
Adoption reality: A 2025 Microsoft analysis estimates global AI adoption at 16.3%, with leading countries above 60% and a widening gap between the Global North and Global South [10]. The Society Beats internal AI engagement note circulated in January 2026, based on the Economist’s Jul–Dec 2025 chart, places Armenia at roughly 5–8% monthly AI users; below Georgia and lower than expected, confirming room for increased engagement [29]. OpenAI reports that health is among the most common ChatGPT use cases, with over 230 million people asking health and wellness questions each week; the Health experience was developed with input from 260+ physicians in 60 countries who provided 600,000+ rounds of feedback on model outputs [18]. Without structured access, Armenia risks falling further behind; a national program is the mechanism to close the gap.
Armenia’s gap and readiness: Armenia spends 2.4% of GDP on education, below the 4.3% world average, and government education spending was about $580.5 million in 2023 [28]. The World Bank’s Human Capital Index estimates that a child in Armenia can expect 11.3 years of schooling but only 8.0 learning-adjusted years; the HCI is 0.58 [26]. Brain drain is high at 6.9/10 (global average 4.98) and tech workforce growth slowed to 2% in 2024 [3][23]. At the same time, Armenia ranks 48th globally in e-government, has announced plans for a $500 million AI data center with NVIDIA as a key partner, and has national distribution channels through TUMO and Armath [4][5][24][25].
Cost discipline: Partnership pricing is not public; the US federal government received an offer of $1 per agency per year for ChatGPT Enterprise [8], illustrating strategic government pricing rather than a benchmark Armenia should expect to match. Estonia is investing EUR 85 million over three years to provide AI access to 58,000 students and 5,000 teachers through a multi-vendor program [2]. Armenia’s education spending provides a clear benchmark for affordability once terms are known [28]. The negotiation mandate should require explicit ROI thresholds grounded in the evidence above before any scale-up.
Program fit and urgency: OpenAI for Countries states a goal of pursuing 10 projects in its first phase, and OpenAI has announced country partnerships including a UK memorandum of understanding and the OpenAI for Greece education/startup initiative [15][16][17]. Armenia should seek a phased program, students and teachers first, then government and healthcare, then the general public, aligned to existing channels and infrastructure. Armenian language development should be a contractual requirement, supported by OpenAI’s localization approach and precedents in small-language investment such as Icelandic; Armenian language resources remain limited [7][14][15].
I. The Problem
Education in Crisis
Armenia’s education system operates under severe resource constraints that translate directly into diminished outcomes. Public education spending stands at 2.4% of GDP, compared to a world average of 4.3%, and government education spending totaled about $580.5 million in 2023 [28]. Armenian children can expect 11.3 years of schooling but receive learning equivalent to only 8.0 years due to quality gaps; the Human Capital Index is 0.58 [26].
Brain Drain and Workforce Stagnation
Armenia’s brain drain index of 6.9/10 places it among the highest in the world, where the global average is 4.98 [23]. The technology sector illustrates this dynamic. After years of double-digit growth, workforce expansion slowed to 2% in 2024 [3]. Employment declined by 1,960 workers, a 5.4% drop, from 2023 to 2024 [3].
Geographic concentration compounds the problem. Ninety-four percent of Armenia’s 58,700 tech workers are based in Yerevan [3]. Regions outside the capital lack the infrastructure, community, and opportunity that retain talent. Rural areas experience brain drain internally before losing population internationally. This is not merely an economic problem. When the most capable people leave, institutions weaken. Public administration, healthcare, and education lose the talent needed for reform. The capacity to change depends on people who increasingly choose not to stay.
The AI Divide
Artificial intelligence is restructuring economic opportunity globally. Controlled studies show generative AI can raise worker productivity by 14–37% in writing and support tasks [11][22]. A 2025 Microsoft analysis estimates global AI adoption at 16.3%, with leading countries such as the UAE at 64.0% and Singapore at 60.9%, and a widening gap between the Global North (24.7% of working-age population) and Global South (14.1%) [10]. The question is not whether AI will reshape work, but which countries will capture the benefits.
Regional competition is also policy-driven. Turkey supports app and software development through its Technology Development Zones (technoparks): profits from software and R&D activities are exempt from corporate tax; wages for R&D and software developers receive income tax exemptions (currently extended through 2028); VAT exemptions apply to software outputs including mobile applications (extended into 2028); and employers receive social security premium support for R&D and software staff [20]. These incentives lower development costs and make Turkey an increasingly attractive base for app startups and talent. Armenia needs a comparable advantage; broad AI access can deliver that edge by compressing development cycles and boosting productivity.
The gap is not closing. Countries with subsidized access and adoption programs are pulling further ahead. The risk is that Armenia falls into a trap: without intervention, adoption will remain limited, productivity gains will accrue elsewhere, and skilled workers will have even more reason to emigrate.
Inaction is not a neutral choice. A 2025 Microsoft analysis found AI adoption in the Global South at 14.1% versus 24.7% in the Global North; the gap is growing, not stabilizing [10]. Armenia risks falling further behind if access remains limited and uneven, especially for Armenian-language users given constrained language resources [14]. The policy question is therefore whether Armenia will close the gap through structured adoption or allow it to widen.
AI access alone does not reduce emigration. The theory of change is that productivity gains accrue to Armenian firms and institutions, improving compensation competitiveness and expanding the set of globally relevant work performable from Yerevan or Gyumri. When a developer in Vanadzor can ship production code at the same pace as one in Berlin, location becomes less determinative of opportunity. Phase 2’s focus on government and healthcare specifically targets public-sector retention, where brain drain most damages institutional capacity. The intervention is necessary but not sufficient; complementary policies on compensation, housing, and quality of life remain essential.
Language Marginalization
Armenian language resources remain limited. The Eastern Armenian National Corpus contains about 4.5 million words and the ArmSpeech corpus provides approximately 5,350 hours of validated speech data [14]. Without targeted investment, Armenian-language AI will lag, forcing users to rely on foreign-language tools or degraded native-language performance. The alternative is to ensure that AI capability develops alongside Armenian language support, making fluency in Armenian an asset rather than a limitation.
Language marginalization has economic consequences beyond model accuracy. If productivity tools work substantially better in English, Armenian becomes economically costly to use in professional settings. Over time this functions like a tax on native-language work, accelerating language shift among the most mobile and educated workers. Armenian language AI capability is therefore not only localization; it is infrastructure for the language’s continued economic viability.
II. The Opportunity
OpenAI for Countries
OpenAI launched the “OpenAI for Countries” program in 2025, offering national partnerships that may include secure in-country data centers, customized citizen-facing AI tools, localized language and cultural support, and public service integration for healthcare, education, and government [15]. The program represents OpenAI’s strategic bet that governments will be major AI customers. By establishing partnerships early, OpenAI gains market position while countries gain access to technology they could not develop independently. Both parties benefit from the relationship’s exclusivity and depth.
Pricing for government partnerships differs dramatically from commercial rates. The US federal government received an offer of $1 per agency per year for ChatGPT Enterprise, with an additional 60-day period of access to advanced models [8]. International terms have not been publicly disclosed, but emphasis often falls on infrastructure investment and strategic alignment rather than pure subscription revenue.
Countries Already Engaged
OpenAI has announced country partnerships under this initiative, including a UK memorandum of understanding to explore AI adoption and infrastructure and the OpenAI for Greece partnership focused on education and startup development [16][17].
OpenAI for Countries states a goal of pursuing 10 projects in its first phase [15]. This is not a pilot program; it is infrastructure buildout at global scale.
What a Partnership Includes
Based on announced terms, OpenAI for Countries partnerships can include data sovereignty guarantees with in-country data storage and processing, customized ChatGPT deployments for citizen access, localized language support, public service integration for healthcare, education, and administrative functions, training and implementation support, and potential co-investment in startup ecosystems [15]. The specifics are negotiable. Armenia should require data sovereignty and in-country processing as core terms, not assume them. Countries with leverage from strategic location, existing infrastructure, or unique assets obtain better terms. Armenia’s position is not without strengths: a planned AI data center, existing e-government infrastructure, and established educational technology channels provide foundation. The Diaspora adds another dimension, extending market relevance beyond Armenia’s borders.
Vendor Selection Rationale: Why OpenAI, Why Single-Vendor
OpenAI for Countries is a formalized, government-facing initiative with published partnership examples and an explicit early portfolio-building phase [15][16][17]. This creates a negotiating window with established scaffolding; implementation playbooks, dedicated government engagement capacity, and a clear public narrative, that can reduce time-to-deployment compared to bespoke negotiations.
Armenia should launch with a single anchor vendor for Phases 1–2 to minimize coordination burden, accelerate deployment, and create clear accountability for outcomes and incident response. Multi-vendor designs increase contracting, security review, training, and integration complexity, which becomes the dominant failure risk in capacity-constrained administrations. The single-vendor choice is operational, not ideological: the agreement must mandate interoperability, portability, and exit protections so Armenia can add additional vendors in Phase 3 once institutional capacity and use-case maturity are proven.
III. The Evidence
Education: The Nigeria Study
The strongest evidence for AI in education comes from a World Bank randomized controlled trial conducted in Benin City, Nigeria, during June and July 2024 [27]. Students in the treatment group received six weeks of AI tutoring. Assessment was by pen-and-paper tests, not digital platforms, eliminating concerns about teaching to the interface. The results were large and statistically significant: students in the AI tutoring program outperformed the control group in all subjects, including English, which was the primary target. The magnitude of improvement corresponded to gains that typically require roughly two years of conventional schooling. Six weeks of AI tutoring produced learning gains comparable to that level of progress.
Effect sizes of this magnitude invite skepticism. Education interventions rarely produce gains this large, and publication bias favors positive results. Three factors support credibility here: the study used pen-and-paper assessment rather than digital platforms, eliminating teaching-to-the-interface concerns; teachers remained involved throughout, reflecting realistic deployment rather than laboratory conditions; and the setting was a Nigerian regional capital, not a privileged pilot site. The meta-analytic confirmation across 51–68 studies reduces the likelihood that the Nigeria result is an outlier [12][21]. Nevertheless, the Phase 1 pilot exists precisely to validate transferability to Armenian conditions before scaled commitment. If Armenia-specific effects are substantially smaller, the evaluation gate prevents wasted expenditure.
These design features strengthen relevance and suggest transferability to comparable contexts; a Gyumri pilot would validate local fit [27].
Education: Meta-Analytic Confirmation
Individual studies can mislead; meta-analyses aggregate multiple studies to estimate true effect sizes. Two recent meta-analyses of AI in education confirm large positive effects. A ScienceDirect meta-analysis published in 2025, covering 68 studies from January 2023 to May 2025 with 131 effect sizes, found Hedges’ g = 1.12 for undergraduate learning outcomes [21]. A Nature Humanities and Social Sciences meta-analysis, also 2025, covering 51 studies from November 2022 to February 2025, found g = 0.867 for learning performance, g = 0.456 for learning perception, and g = 0.457 for higher-order thinking skills [12]. The studies span different subjects and implementations, but the direction of effect is consistently positive [12][21].
Productivity: LLM Support Tasks
Two controlled productivity studies show that LLM assistance improves output on writing and support tasks by 14–37% [11][22]. These are the same task categories that dominate public-sector workflows (drafting, summarization, translation, and response composition), making the evidence directly relevant to civil service and education use cases.
Adoption Trajectories and Health Demand
A 2025 Microsoft analysis estimates global AI adoption at 16.3%, with leading countries above 60% and a widening gap between the Global North and Global South [10]. OpenAI reports that health is among the most common ChatGPT use cases, with over 230 million people asking health and wellness questions each week; the ChatGPT Health experience was developed with input from 260+ physicians in 60 countries who provided 600,000+ rounds of feedback on model outputs [18]. A 2024 study found ChatGPT achieved 74% diagnostic accuracy and 82% prescription accuracy on medical questions common in low- and middle-income countries; this is evidence of model capability, not a clinical deployment model [9]. The policy question is whether Armenia will close the adoption gap through structured access and Armenian-language support or allow it to widen.
Alternatives Considered
Status quo: Without intervention, LLM adoption continues unevenly. Benefits accrue to English-proficient, urban, better-resourced users. Armenian-language capability remains neglected. No institutional learning occurs about effective deployment. The gap documented in Section I widens.
Domestic model development: Armenia lacks the compute budget, training data, and specialized talent to develop frontier models. The NVIDIA data center enables inference and application deployment, not pre-training at scale [4]. Domestic capacity should complement partnership, not substitute for it.
Open-weight models (DeepSeek, Mistral): Viable for technical users and specific applications, but lack the deployment infrastructure, safety systems, user interfaces, and ongoing model improvement that a structured partnership provides. Open-weight options could supplement a national program, particularly for developers and researchers, but cannot deliver the turnkey public-service deployment that education and government use cases require.
Multi-vendor from launch: Estonia’s AI Leap program partners with OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google simultaneously [2]. This approach offers redundancy and competitive pressure but adds coordination burden: separate contracts, integration requirements, training programs, and vendor management. Armenia’s capacity constraints favor a single-vendor launch with contractual interoperability and portability requirements, adding vendors only in Phase 3 once the operating model is proven at scale.
Wait 18–24 months: Model capabilities may commoditize, potentially improving terms. However, waiting cedes early-mover positioning; if Georgia secures a partnership first, Armenia loses regional leadership. The current window (data-center momentum and OpenAI’s active portfolio-building) may not persist [4][15][16][17]. Early entrants are likely to receive more implementation attention and customization support than later additions to a mature portfolio.
The recommendation reflects a judgment that structured partnership offers the fastest path to measurable outcomes, that OpenAI’s program provides the clearest entry point, and that single-vendor launch suits Armenia’s current institutional capacity. The phased approach preserves optionality: if Phase 1 underperforms or vendor dynamics shift, Phase 2 can adjust.
IV. Why Armenia
Current Position: Room to Grow
Oxford Insights’ Government AI Readiness Index ranks Armenia 88th globally with a score of 44.51, ahead of Azerbaijan at 111th with 39.92 and close to Georgia at 81st with 46.92 [19]. The scores reflect infrastructure, governance capacity, and existing digital services rather than current AI deployment. Armenia’s ranking suggests capacity to absorb AI technology if access is provided.
Regional dynamics add urgency. Georgia ranks seven places ahead of Armenia on AI readiness [19]. If Georgia secures an OpenAI partnership first, Armenia loses early-adopter positioning in the South Caucasus.
Infrastructure Foundation
Armenia’s digital infrastructure supports nationwide AI deployment. Internet penetration stands at 80% [1]. Mobile connections number 4.35 million for a population of 2.95 million, representing 147% penetration. Among mobile users, 96.7% have broadband-capable devices [1]. The mobile-first approach that enables AI access in developing countries is functional in Armenia. E-government infrastructure provides distribution channels: Armenia ranks 48th globally on the UN E-Government Index, placing it in the Very High EGDI group and leading the South Caucasus region [25].
The $500 million Firebird.ai data center represents strategic infrastructure, with NVIDIA as a key partner [4]. A national AI access program would have a pathway to local infrastructure over the policy timeline.
Educational Distribution Channels
Existing programs provide proven distribution networks for AI in education. The TUMO Armenia program reports 25,000+ teens weekly across 14 hubs and 79 TUMO Boxes, with 110,000+ alumni [24]. TUMO’s model is tested, scaled, and positioned to absorb AI tools. Armath Labs operates over 600 labs serving 17,200 students across seven countries with robotics, programming, and 3D modeling curricula [5]. The labs are distributed across the country, addressing the concentration problem that affects most Armenian technology initiatives.
Generation AI, operated by the FAST Foundation, currently serves 540 students across 15 schools in seven provinces, with expansion plans to additional schools [6]. This is an emerging pilot channel rather than a scaled nationwide program.
V. Cost Analysis
What We Know
Pricing for government partnerships differs from commercial rates, though international terms vary significantly by country and strategic context. The US federal government received an offer of $1 per agency per year for ChatGPT Enterprise [8]; this figure illustrates OpenAI’s willingness to price government partnerships strategically rather than commercially, not a benchmark Armenia should expect to match. Estonia’s EUR 85 million investment for 63,000 users provides a more relevant reference point for planning purposes [2].
Estonia’s AI Leap 2025 program invests EUR 85 million over three years (2024–2026) to provide AI access to 58,000 students and 5,000 teachers through partnerships with OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google [2]. This multi-vendor approach and education focus may be the most relevant comparison for Armenia’s situation.
Budget Context
Whatever the negotiated cost, it should be evaluated against relevant budget lines and explicit ROI thresholds. Government education spending totaled about $580.5 million in 2023 (2.4% of GDP) [28]. The technology sector generates $2.3 billion in annual revenue and contributes 7% of GDP [3].
The cost question should not block negotiation. The first step is to engage OpenAI and understand what terms are possible. Budget allocation follows term negotiation, not the reverse.
Cost Envelope (Illustrative)
Estonia’s program implies a rough per-user benchmark: EUR 85 million over three years for 63,000 users (58,000 students and 5,000 teachers) equates to approximately EUR 450 per user per year at full implementation [2]. If Armenia negotiated even 10% of that per-user cost on an income-adjusted basis, the envelope would be roughly EUR 45 per user per year. The total Phase 1 envelope can therefore be expressed as EUR 45 × (Phase 1 user count), using official Ministry headcounts once confirmed.
A complementary budget framing uses education spending as a reference point. With $580.5 million in annual government education spending [28], a 1% envelope is about $5.8 million per year, 2% is about $11.6 million, and 5% is about $29.0 million. These figures are not commitments; they are decision aids for ministers evaluating affordability and negotiating guardrails.
Phased Approach
A phased rollout reduces initial capital requirements and allows learning before scaling; the structure follows natural priority ordering. Phase 1 would cover students and teachers through existing channels: TUMO, Armath, Generation AI, and public schools. Per-user costs would depend on negotiated terms but should be significantly below commercial rates given the scale and public-sector context.
Phase 2 would expand to government and healthcare workers across civil service and health systems. Phase 3 would extend access to the general public, potentially through subsidized subscriptions or free access at public institutions. Full population coverage would depend on Phase 1 and 2 outcomes and available budget.
VI. Implementation
Phase 1: Education (Months 1–12)
The first phase focuses on students and teachers, where evidence is strongest and distribution channels exist. Implementation would proceed through partnership agreements with TUMO, Armath, Generation AI, and the Ministry of Education. Teacher training is critical: the Nigeria study found that AI tutoring works best when teachers are involved, not when AI replaces instruction [27]. Phase 1 must include comprehensive teacher training on AI integration, assessment adaptation, and academic integrity management. Existing programs like Generation AI have developed curricula that can be scaled.
Phase 1 must be designed with teachers, not around them. The Nigeria study’s design kept teachers involved while AI supplemented instruction [27]. This is not merely a pedagogical choice but a political necessity: teacher unions and education professionals must see the program as enhancing their effectiveness, not threatening their roles. Early communication, co-design of training programs, and explicit commitments to teacher roles are prerequisites for sustainable implementation.
Assessment reform should accompany access. Traditional examinations that test memorization and reproduction become less meaningful when AI can perform these tasks. Phase 1 should pilot assessment approaches that evaluate reasoning, synthesis, and application, skills that AI enhances rather than replaces. Geographic distribution requires attention: Armath Labs’ network of 600+ labs provides nationwide reach [5], but connectivity and device access vary. Mobile-first deployment may be more practical than desktop or laptop-based approaches in many regions given high mobile broadband penetration [1]. Metrics for Phase 1 include learning outcome improvements on standardized assessments, regional distribution of access and usage, teacher adoption and satisfaction rates, and academic integrity incident tracking.
Financing and Evaluation
The World Bank conducted the Nigeria RCT that demonstrated rapid learning gains [27]. Co-financing and independent evaluation through the World Bank’s Education Global Practice are viable paths if Armenia chooses to pursue them. These options can reduce budget exposure, add external validation, and position Armenia as a site for rigorous AI-education research.
The Armenian diaspora can also de-risk early phases. The diaspora represents both a political and financial resource; organizations such as AGBU, the FAST Foundation, and diaspora tech networks could be potential co-financiers. If diaspora sources committed to partial Phase 1 funding, even 20–30% of pilot costs, this would materially reduce fiscal exposure and signal external validation. Diaspora engagement can run in parallel with OpenAI negotiations.
Phase 2: Government and Healthcare (Months 12–24)
The second phase extends access to civil servants and healthcare workers. E-gov.am infrastructure supports deployment to government users. Healthcare system integration would proceed through the Ministry of Health and existing health information systems. Government use cases should begin with high-impact, low-risk applications: document drafting, translation, information retrieval, and citizen inquiry response. These tasks have demonstrated productivity gains in other contexts and present minimal risk of consequential errors [11][22].
Healthcare applications require more caution. AI should support clinical decision-making, not replace it. Initial deployment might focus on administrative tasks, patient communication, and health education rather than diagnostic applications. As confidence builds and local validation occurs, clinical support tools could be introduced. Training for Phase 2 differs from Phase 1: government and healthcare workers need task-specific instruction, not general AI literacy. Training should focus on job-relevant applications with clear guidelines on appropriate and inappropriate uses. Metrics for Phase 2 include task time reduction, service quality indicators, user adoption rates, and error or misuse incident tracking.
Phase 3: General Public (Months 24–36)
The third phase extends access beyond institutions to the general public. This phase depends on Phase 1 and 2 outcomes and available resources. Implementation might include subsidized subscriptions, free access at libraries and community centers, or integration with telecommunications services. Public deployment raises different considerations: user support requirements increase, content moderation becomes relevant, and digital literacy varies widely. Phase 3 planning should draw on Phase 1 and 2 experience to anticipate challenges.
The Armenian language component becomes most relevant in Phase 3. Public users expect interaction in their native language. Progress on Armenian language support during Phases 1 and 2 should enable fluent public-facing tools by Phase 3.
Armenian Language Development
Armenian language capability matters for program legitimacy and long-term value. Users expect interaction in their native language; tools that work well only in English accelerate language marginalization rather than countering it.
Armenia should be realistic about leverage here. Armenian is a low-resource language with limited training corpora; roughly 4.5 million words in the Eastern Armenian National Corpus and approximately 5,350 hours of validated speech data [14]. OpenAI has invested in smaller languages; Icelandic received dedicated development including volunteer training cohorts [7]. But Iceland’s effort required sustained government commitment and community mobilization, not simply contractual demands.
The partnership negotiation should request Armenian language improvement, but the binding commitment should focus on transparency and measurement rather than guaranteed outcomes. Specific asks: baseline benchmarking of Armenian performance on standard tasks at contract signing; periodic reporting on Armenian-language capability relative to comparable languages (Georgian, Baltic languages); and access to evaluation data that allows Armenian institutions to measure progress.
Parallel investment matters more than contractual demands. Armenia should commit to expanding Armenian language resources, corpus development, speech data collection, benchmark creation, that benefit any AI provider. The NVIDIA data center and local universities can support this work. If OpenAI’s Armenian capability remains inadequate, these resources enable alternative providers or open-weight models to fill the gap. Language development is a national infrastructure project, not solely a vendor deliverable.
VII. Risks and Mitigations
Academic Integrity
The risk is that students use AI to complete assignments without learning, undermining educational outcomes. The mitigation involves teacher training on assignment design, AI-appropriate assessment methods, and academic integrity frameworks.
Digital Divide
The risk is that benefits accrue to urban, wealthy, and advantaged populations while others are left behind. The mitigation involves mobile-first deployment leveraging high mobile broadband penetration [1], distribution through Armath Labs’ network of 600+ labs [5], and explicit geographic equity metrics. Phase 1 should track regional usage and adjust deployment if disparities emerge.
Vendor Dependency
The risk is that a single-vendor launch increases dependency and pricing leverage over time. The mitigation is contractual portability and exit rights (data export, migration support, termination triggers), pricing predictability (caps, benchmarking reopeners, or most-favored public-sector clauses), and data residency and handling commitments that limit exposure. A Phase 3 decision gate should explicitly allow adding vendors or switching if market or geopolitical conditions shift.
Geopolitical Considerations
A US-based AI partnership introduces geopolitical risk: sanctions dynamics, cross-border data access concerns, and potential political pressure in crisis scenarios. Armenia should therefore insist on strict data sovereignty, escrowed model access where feasible, and contractual exit provisions. The planned NVIDIA-partnered data center provides a pathway to local infrastructure that can reduce external dependency over time [4]. These terms should be explicit in negotiation mandates, not assumed.
Data Protection, Procurement, and Auditability
The risk is legal, reputational, and operational backlash if data handling or model behavior violates Armenian law or public service standards. The mitigation involves a data classification framework, in-country processing for sensitive categories, audit logs for all government use cases, red-teaming and safety evaluations before deployment, and a procurement path that aligns with competition, transparency, and value-for-money requirements. Independent evaluation should be built into Phase 1 contracts.
Language Bias
The risk is that AI tools work well in English but poorly in Armenian, disadvantaging Armenian-language users and accelerating language marginalization. The mitigation involves Armenian language development as a contractual requirement, not an aspiration: specific commitments to Eastern and Western Armenian support, local validation of Armenian-language performance before scaled deployment, and investment in Armenian language resources including corpus, training data, and benchmarks that benefit all AI providers.
Implementation Failure
The risk is that multi-vendor complexity derails delivery in the first 12–24 months. The mitigation is a single-vendor launch with strict KPIs and evaluation gates; additional vendors should be added only after the government proves it can absorb the operating model at scale [13].
VIII. Recommendation
Armenia should initiate formal negotiations with OpenAI under the “OpenAI for Countries” program with the following objectives:
Negotiating Position: Armenia brings existing e-government infrastructure ranked 48th globally [25], approved AI compute capacity through the $500 million NVIDIA data center [4], proven education technology channels including TUMO and Armath, and a global Diaspora that extends market relevance beyond borders. These assets provide negotiating leverage.
Core Terms: Any agreement should include data sovereignty guarantees with in-country storage and processing, Armenian language development commitments covering both Eastern and Western variants, interoperability and portability requirements that allow additional vendors, phased pricing appropriate to Armenia’s income level, and training and implementation support.
Timeline: Target announcement of a partnership within 12 months. Phase 1 deployment to education within 18 months. Full implementation over 36 months.
Budget: Cost cannot be estimated until negotiations establish terms. Budget allocation should follow negotiation, not precede it. The government should authorize negotiation without committing to specific figures.
Institutional Lead: The Ministry of High-Tech Industry should lead negotiations with coordination from the Ministry of Education and the Prime Minister’s Office. A dedicated program management office should be established upon partnership announcement.
First 60 Days: Authorize a negotiating mandate that specifies a single anchor vendor for Phases 1–2 with mandatory portability and exit clauses; appoint a program lead and negotiation team; decide the procurement route (time-bounded single-vendor pilot with competitive tender for scale, or competitive dialogue with an anchor-vendor outcome) and publish a short justification memo; define Phase 1 KPIs and evaluation design; initiate legal, data protection, and procurement reviews; prepare a pilot implementation plan for education channels; and define a Phase 3 decision gate for adding or switching vendors.
The evidence supports action. The infrastructure exists. The negotiating window favors early movers: countries that join OpenAI’s initial portfolio receive implementation attention, customization resources, and precedent-setting influence that later entrants cannot expect [15][16][17]. As the program matures, Armenia becomes one applicant among many rather than a strategic early partner. Regional dynamics add pressure; if Georgia moves first, Armenia loses early-adopter positioning in the South Caucasus [19].
Armenia faces a choice that will shape its human capital trajectory for a generation. The risk of action is a failed pilot and sunk costs, bounded by evaluation gates and phased commitment. The risk of inaction is permanent disadvantage in the defining technology of the era, compounding the education and brain-drain gaps documented above. Armenia should negotiate, and it should start as soon as possible.
References
[1] DataReportal (2025). Digital 2025: Armenia. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-armenia
[2] e-Estonia (2025). AI Leap 2025: Estonia Sets AI Standard in Education. https://e-estonia.com/ai-leap-2025-estonia-sets-ai-standard-in-education/
[3] EVN Report (2025). Armenia’s Tech Sector in 2025. https://evnreport.com/creative-tech/armenias-tech-sector-in-2025/
[4] EVN Report (2025). Bringing AI Home: What Data Center Means for Armenia. https://evnreport.com/creative-tech/bringing-ai-home-what-data-center-means-for-armenia/
[5] EVN Report (2025). Armath Labs: Creating a Pan-Armenian STEM Community. https://evnreport.com/creative-tech/armath-labs-creating-a-pan-armenian-stem-community/
[6] FAST Foundation (2024). Generation AI Program. https://fast.foundation/ajax/get_business_page?parent=programs&slug=generation-ai
[7] Government of Iceland (2024). Language Technology Programme for Icelandic 2024–2026. https://www.government.is/library/01-Ministries/Ministry-of-culture-and-business-affairs/Language-technology-programme-for-icelandic-2024-2026-web.pdf
[8] GSA (2025). GSA Announces New Partnership with OpenAI. https://www.gsa.gov/about-us/newsroom/news-releases/gsa-announces-new-partnership-with-openai-delivering-deep-discount-to-chatgpt-08062025
[9] JMIR (2024). Diagnostic Accuracy of ChatGPT in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e56121
[10] Microsoft AI Economy Institute (2025). Global AI Adoption in 2025 – A Widening Digital Divide (AI Diffusion data). https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/group/aiei/ai-diffusion/
[11] MIT (2023). Study Finds ChatGPT Boosts Worker Productivity for Writing. https://news.mit.edu/2023/study-finds-chatgpt-boosts-worker-productivity-writing-0714
[12] Nature (2025). Meta-analysis of AI in Education. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04787-y
[13] OECD (2025). Governing with Artificial Intelligence. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/06/governing-with-artificial-intelligence_398fa287/
[14] Open Data Armenia (2024). Armenian Language Resources.
https://data.opendata.am/
[15] OpenAI (2025). Introducing OpenAI for Countries. https://openai.com/global-affairs/openai-for-countries/
[16] OpenAI (2025). OpenAI and UK Government Partnership. https://openai.com/global-affairs/openai-and-uk-government-partnership/
[17] OpenAI (2025). OpenAI for Greece. https://openai.com/global-affairs/openai-for-greece/
[18] OpenAI (2025). Introducing ChatGPT Health. https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-health/
[19] Oxford Insights (2024). AI Readiness Index. https://oxfordinsights.com/ai-readiness/ai-readiness-index/
[20] PwC (2025). Turkey - Corporate - Tax credits and incentives. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/turkey/corporate/tax-credits-and-incentives
[21] ScienceDirect (2025). Meta-analysis of ChatGPT in Undergraduate Learning. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25001766
[22] Stanford/MIT NBER (2023). AI Boosted Worker Productivity Study. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/25/stanford-and-mit-study-ai-boosted-worker-productivity-by-14percent.html
[23] The Global Economy (2024). Armenia Brain Drain Index. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Armenia/human_flight_brain_drain_index/
[24] TUMO Armenia (2025). TUMO Armenia Campaign.
https://armenia.tumo.org/
[25] UN E-Government Survey (2024). https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2024
[26] World Bank HCI (2020). Human Capital Index: Armenia. https://databankfiles.worldbank.org/public/ddpext_download/hci/HCI_1pager_ARM.pdf
[27] World Bank (2025). From Chalkboards to Chatbots: Transforming Learning in Nigeria. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/education/From-chalkboards-to-chatbots-Transforming-learning-in-Nigeria
[28] World Data (2024). Education in Armenia. https://www.worlddata.info/asia/armenia/education.php
[29] Society Beats (2026). Internal AI engagement note (Jan 2026).